Philosophical Papers 48 (3):379-402 (2019)

Authors
Leonid Tarasov
University of Manchester
Abstract
Moderate invariantism is the orthodox semantics for knowledge attributions. In recent years it has fallen out of favour, in large part because it fails to explain why ordinary speakers have the intuition that some utterances of knowledge attributions are felicitous and others infelicitous in several types of cases. To address this issue moderate invariantists have developed a variety of what I call non-semantic theories which they claim account for the relevant felicity intuitions independently of moderate invariantist semantics. Some critics have responded by arguing that these non-semantic theories are implausible for one or more of the following reasons: they do not have a basis in empirical data or established theory; they do not account for all of the relevant felicity intuitions; they are ad hoc; or they in fact explain too many felicity intuitions and thus undermine the...
Keywords knowledge attributions  moderate invariantism  bank cases  availability heuristic  adaptive belief  perspective projection
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/05568641.2018.1463821
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,956
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Solving the Skeptical Problem.Keith DeRose - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):1-52.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.
Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):200-201.
Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons.Stewart Cohen - 1999 - Philosophical Perspectives 13:57-89.
Knowledge and Lotteries.David Jehle - 2004 - Studia Logica 84 (1):161-163.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why We Need Corpus Linguistics in Intuition-Based Semantics.Leonid Tarasov - 2018 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (4):421-435.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Projective Prewellorderings Vs Projective Wellfounded Relations.Xianghui Shi - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2):579-596.
Projective Spinor Geometry and Prespace.F. A. M. Frescura - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (8):777-808.
Undecidable Theories of Lyndon Algebras.Vera Stebletsova & Yde Venema - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):207-224.
Undecidable Theories of Lyndon Algebras.Vera Stebletsova & Yde Venema - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):207-224.
Projective Uniformization Revisited.Kai Hauser & Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 103 (1-3):109-153.
Projective Well-Orderings of the Reals.Andrés Eduardo Caicedo & Ralf Schindler - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (7):783-793.
Supercompactness Within the Projective Hierarchy.Howard Becker & Steve Jackson - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):658-672.
A Note on Generic Projective Planes.Koichiro Ikeda - 2002 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (4):249-254.
Projective Unification in Modal Logic.Wojciech Dzik & Piotr Wojtylak - 2012 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 20 (1):121-153.
Projective Forcing.Joan Bagaria & Roger Bosch - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 86 (3):237-266.
The Consistency Strength of Projective Absoluteness.Kai Hauser - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 74 (3):245-295.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-09

Total views
32 ( #306,221 of 2,343,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,210 of 2,343,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes