Political Theory 32 (4):468-494 (2004)

Authors
Abstract
In certain contemporary theories of the politics of shame, shame is considered a pernicious emotion that we need to avoid in, or a salutary emotion that serves as an infallible guide to, democratic deliberation. The author argues that both positions arise out of an inadequate notion of the structure of shame and an oversimplistic opposition between shame and shamelessness. Plato's dialogue, the Gorgias, actually helps to address these problems because it supplies a deeper understanding of the place of shame in democratic politics in ways that address our contemporary dilemmas. It does this first, by avoiding the simple opposition between shame and shamelessness and secondly, by articulating three different kinds of "politics of shame" that can characterize democratic deliberations. Finally, Plato's treatment of shame extends upon contemporary ethical and psychoanalytic notions of shame in ways that are directly relevant to the our contemporary political situation
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0090591704265523
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Shame and the Future of Feminism.Jill Locke - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (4):146-162.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Plato and the Politics of Shame.Christina Helen Tarnopolsky - 2002 - Dissertation, The University of Chicago

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
53 ( #174,046 of 2,326,007 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #650,227 of 2,326,007 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes