Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):621-630 (2011)
Abstract |
The death of a research participant raises numerous ethical and legal issues regarding the return of research results to related family members. This question is particularly acute in the context of genetic research since the research results from an individual may be relevant to each of the biological relatives. This paper first investigates the ethical and legal frameworks governing the return of a deceased participant's individual research results to his or her related family members. Then, it weighs the rights and interests of both the deceased individual and related family members in an attempt to identify key ethical considerations underlying the return of such results. This analysis of international guidelines and national laws and regulations reveals that though the legal framework regarding privacy and confidentiality of clinical and research information is well established (albeit not homogenous), guidelines are generally absent in the post-mortem context. Nevertheless, a brief analysis of this issue through two ethical perspectives (principlism and consequentialism) allows us to identify six key elements to be taken into consideration when returning a deceased participant's research results
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00629.x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Consequentialism.Brad Hooker - 2010 - In John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge.
Citations of this work BETA
Relationships Matter: Ethical Considerations for Returning Results to Family Members of Deceased Subjects.Lauren C. Milner, Emily Y. Liu & Nanibaa’ A. Garrison - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (10):66 - 67.
International Policies on Sharing Genomic Research Results with Relatives: Approaches to Balancing Privacy with Access.Rebecca Branum & Susan M. Wolf - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (3):576-593.
The Ever-Evolving Concept of Clinical Significance and the Potential for Sins of Omission in Genetic Research.Gregory Costain & Anne S. Bassett - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):22-24.
Similar books and articles
Pediatric Research and the Return of Individual Research Results.Denise Avard, Karine Sénécal, Parvaz Madadi & Daniel Sinnett - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):593-604.
Genomic Inheritances: Disclosing Individual Research Results From Whole-Exome Sequencing to Deceased Participants' Relatives.Ben Chan, Flavia M. Facio, Haley Eidem, Sara Chandros Hull, Leslie G. Biesecker & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):1-8.
Return of Research Results: General Principles and International Perspectives.Emmanuelle Lévesque, Yann Joly & Jacques Simard - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):583-592.
Familial Communication of Research Results: A Need to Know?Lee Black & Kelly A. McClellan - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):605-613.
Disclosure of Research Result to Research Participants: Needs and Attitudes of Adolescents and Parents.Conrad Vincent Fernandez, Shaureen Taweel, Eric D. Kodish & Charles Weijer - unknown
Return of Results: Towards a Lexicon?Bartha Maria Knoppers & Amy Dam - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):577-582.
The Return of Research Results to Participants: Pilot Questionnaire of Adolescents and Parents of Children with Cancer.Conrad V. Fernandez, Darcy Santor, Charles Weijer, Caron Strahlendorf, Albert Moghrabi, Rebecca Pentz, Jun Gao & Eric Kodish - unknown
Biobanks and the Return of Research Results: Out with the Old and In with the New?Ma'N. H. Zawati & Amélie Rioux - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):614-620.
Offering to Return Results to Research Participants: Attitudes and Needs of Principal Investigators in the Children's Oncology Group.Conrad V. Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Susan Shurin & Charles Weijer - unknown
Public Expectations for Return of Results From Large-Cohort Genetic Research.Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy & Kathy Hudson - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):36 – 43.
Disclosure of the Right of Research Participants to Receive Research Results: An Analysis of Consent Forms in the Children's Oncology Group.Conrad V. Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Shaureen Taweel, Susan Shurin & Charles Weijer - unknown
Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):8 – 17.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-11-16
Total views
22 ( #510,523 of 2,499,275 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,275 )
2011-11-16
Total views
22 ( #510,523 of 2,499,275 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,275 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads