The Moral Domain of the Medical Record: The Routine Ethics Evaluation

American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):W1-W16 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The structure, content, and orientation of the contemporary medical record inadequately reflect the appropriate influence of patients' rights and bioethics on health care. Most tellingly, the medical chart reveals a remarkable absence of attention to medical ethics, except in the case of crisis management. But medical ethics informs both crisis decision-making and virtually all clinical interventions. Indeed, clinical care embodies a complex array of choices influenced by individual and cultural values, themselves reflecting religious beliefs, personal histories, psychologies, and social mores. But the typical medical chart, which records clinical descriptions, analyses, and rationales for treatment, rarely identifies or accounts for this value-laden dimension of care and thus both over-simplifies and distorts the depiction of a patient's illness and its treatment. To better reflect the complex moral domain of clinical care, and assist in organizing its complex structure, a systematic procedure is proposed here to evaluate the ethical status of every patient: As a routine part of the clinical evaluation, in a designated Ethical Concerns section of the medical record, an ?ethics work-uP? is designed to serve as a moral ?diagnostic? analogous to its scientific counterpart. Adapted to the needs of individual patients, such evaluations should identify ethical problems, coordinate related data, resources, and opinion, and define the rationale for choices made and actions pursued. In establishing improved integration of the ?epistemologies? of care and the ?ethics? of care, the goals of a more humane, patient-centered medicine may be better met

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The voices of the medical record.Suzanne Poirier & Daniel J. Brauner - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (1).
The Ethics of Routine HIV Testing: A Respect-Based Analysis.Thaddeus Metz - 2005 - South African Journal on Human Rights 21 (3):370-405.
Moral theory and medical practice. [REVIEW]Grant Gillett - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (164):379.
The value history: A necessary family document.Renate G. Justin - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Ethical obligation arising from routine screening.V. Warren - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1):54-55.
Establishing a research and evaluation capability for the joint medical education and training campus.Sheila Nataraj Kirby - 2011 - Santa Monica, CA: RAND Center for Military Policy Research. Edited by Julie A. Marsh & Harry Thie.
Ethical analysis of clinical medicine: a guide to self-evaluation.Glenn C. Graber - 1985 - Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg. Edited by Alfred D. Beasley & John A. Eaddy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
28 (#573,535)

6 months
5 (#648,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays.Hilary Putnam - 2002 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
The birth of bioethics.Albert R. Jonsen - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Clinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine.Albert R. Jonsen, Mark Siegler & William J. Winslade - 2015 - New York: McGraw-Hill Education. Edited by Mark Siegler & William J. Winslade.
The virtues in medical practice.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David C. Thomasma.

View all 25 references / Add more references