Philosophical Quarterly 28 (111):97-115 (1978)
While claiming to refute locke's theory of abstract ideas, Berkeley himself accepts a form of abstractionism. Locke's account of abstraction is indeterminate between two doctrines: 1) abstract ideas are representations of paradigm instances of kinds, 2) abstract ideas are schematic representations of the defining features of kinds. Berkeley's arguments are directed exclusively against 2, And refute only a specific version of it, Which there is no reason to ascribe to locke; berkeley himself accepts abstract ideas of the former type. Locke's theory suffers from circularity and redundancy, Berkeley's from conflation of thought with imagination
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Berkeley et les idées générales mathématiques.Claire Schwartz - 2010 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 135 (1):31.
Similar books and articles
Particles And Ideas: Bishop Berkeley's Corpuscularian Philosophy.Gabriel Moked - 1988 - Clarendon Press.
Berkeley's Argument Against Abstract Ideas.Willis Doney - 1983 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):295-308.
How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.Michael Jacovides - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):415-429.
Berkeley and Mental Representation : Why Not a Lockean Theory of Ideas?Martha Brandt Bolton - 2008 - In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), New Interpretations of Berkeley's Thought. Humanity Books.
A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley.John Russell Roberts - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.George Berkeley - 1907 - Dover Publications.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #77,210 of 2,152,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #119,679 of 2,152,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?