Children as Projects and Persons: A Liberal Antinomy

Social Theory and Practice 35 (4):555-576 (2009)
A liberal antinomy of parenting exists: strong liberal intuitions militate in favor of both denying special resources to parenting projects (on grounds of project-neutrality) and granting them (on grounds of respect for personhood). I show that we can reconcile these two claims by rejecting a premise common to both--viz. that liberalism is necessarily committed to extensive procreative liberties--and limiting procreation and subsequent parenting to adults who meet certain psychological and especially financial criteria. I also defend this argument, which provides a Kantian complement to utilitarian arguments for restricting procreation, against a variety of objections.
Keywords antinomy  Immanuel Kant  children  neutrality  procreation  parental licensing  John Stuart Mill
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/soctheorpract200935432
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Robert S. Taylor, Children as Projects and Persons: A Liberal Antinomy
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ryan Reed (2013). Are the Kids Alright? Rawls, Adoption, and Gay Parents. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (5):969-982.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

225 ( #14,813 of 1,924,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

18 ( #33,605 of 1,924,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.