Philosophy Compass 8 (6):539-551 (2013)

Authors
Chloe Taylor
University of Alberta
Abstract
Michel Foucault is well known as a theorist of power who provided forceful critiques of institutions of confinement such as the psychiatric asylum and the prison. Although the invention of factory farms and industrial slaughterhouses, like prisons and psychiatric hospitals, can be considered emblematic moments in a history of modernity, and although the modern farm is an institution of confinement comparable to the prison, Foucault never addressed these institutions, the politics of animal agriculture, or power relationships between humans and other animals more generally. The few times that Foucault discussed animality or human–animal relations, animals and animality remained metaphors for humans and human experiences. Despite Foucault's failure to analyze human–nonhuman animal relations, a significant body of Critical Animal Studies literature has mobilized Foucault's work over the last decade. In particular, a number of scholars have taken up Foucault's writings to consider how relations between humans and nonhuman animals in agriculture might be conceptualized as instances of sovereign power, biopower, disciplinary power, and pastoral power, as well as why we may not think that these are power relations at all. This essay provides an overview of Foucault's accounts of power and of the Foucauldian scholarship that applies these accounts to human–nonhuman animal relations in animal agriculture.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phc3.v8.6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,491
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Animal That Therefore I Am.Jacques Derrida - 2002 - Fordham University Press.
The Animal That Therefore I Am.Jacques Derrida & David Wills - 2002 - Critical Inquiry 28 (2):369-418.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

“Taming the Wild Profusion of Existing Things”?Clare Palmer - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (4):339-358.
“Taming the Wild Profusion of Existing Things”?Clare Palmer - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (4):339-358.
Animality in Foucault's Madness and Civilization. Palmer - 2004 - In Matthew Calarco & Peter Atterton (eds.), Animal Philosophy: Essential Writings in Theory and Culture. Continuum. pp. 72-84.
Animals, Colonisation and Urbanisation.Clare Palmer - 2003 - Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):47-58.
Between Governance and Discipline: The Law and Michel Foucault.Tadros Victor - 1998 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (1):75-103.
Foucault and the Critique of Institutions.John D. Caputo & Mark Yount (eds.) - 1993 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
The Ethics of Captivity Ed. By Lori Gruen.Kelly Struthers Montford & Chloë Taylor - 2016 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26 (2):43-51.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-07-12

Total views
48 ( #203,167 of 2,381,244 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #560,102 of 2,381,244 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes