Markets with Limits: How the Commodification of Academia Derails Debate

Routledge (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Develops a taxonomy of the positions that are held by critics of markets. Taylor argues that market debates derailed because they were conducted in accord with market, rather than academic, norms--and that this demonstrates that market thinking should not govern academic research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Semiotic Limits to Markets Defended.David Rondel - 2021 - Philosophia 50 (1):217-232.
What Limits Should Markets be Without?James Stacey Taylor - 2016 - Business Ethics Journal Review 4 (7):41-46.
A Blocked Exchange? Investment Citizenship and the Limits of the Commodification Objection.Lior Erez - 2023 - In Dimitry Kochenov & Kristin Surak (eds.), Citizenship and Residence Sales: Rethinking the Boundaries of Belonging. Cambridge University Press.
Markets with Some Limits.Mark Wells - 2017 - Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (4):611-618.
Markets Within the Limit of Feasibility.Kenneth Silver - 2023 - Journal of Business Ethics 182:1087-1101.
Democracy and the Epistemic Limits of Markets.Kevin J. Elliott - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (1):1-25.
Conservation through Commodification?Jozef Keulartz - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (3):297-307.
Why Markets in Proto-Deceptive Goods Should Be Restricted.James Stacey Taylor - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4):325-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-21

Downloads
12 (#1,062,297)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Taylor
The College of New Jersey

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references