Computing as a Science: A Survey of Competing Viewpoints [Book Review]
Minds and Machines 21 (3):361-387 (2011)
AbstractSince the birth of computing as an academic discipline, the disciplinary identity of computing has been debated fiercely. The most heated question has concerned the scientific status of computing. Some consider computing to be a natural science and some consider it to be an experimental science. Others argue that computing is bad science, whereas some say that computing is not a science at all. This survey article presents viewpoints for and against computing as a science. Those viewpoints are analyzed against basic positions in the philosophy of science. The article aims at giving the reader an overview, background, and a historical and theoretical frame of reference for understanding and interpreting some central questions in the debates about the disciplinary identity of computer science. The article argues that much of the discussion about the scientific nature of computing is misguided due to a deep conceptual uncertainty about science in general as well as computing in particular
Similar books and articles
Critiques of Knowing: Situated Textualities in Science, Computing, and the Arts.Lynette Hunter - 1999 - Routledge.
Shifting the paradigm of philosophy of science: Philosophy of information and a new renaissance. [REVIEW]Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (4):521-536.
Computing and cognitive science.Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1989 - In Michael I. Posner (ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science. MIT Press.
Recent Computability Models Inspired from Biology: DNA and Membrane Computing.Gheorghe Păun & Mario J. Pérez-Jiménez - 2010 - Theoria 18 (1):71-84.
2nd International Conference on Methods and Models in Science and Technology (Icm2st-11), Jaipur, India, 19-20 November 2011. [REVIEW]R. B. Patel & B. P. Singh (eds.) - 2011 - American Institute of Physics.
Program Verification and Functioning of Operative Computing Revisited: How about Mathematics Engineering? [REVIEW]Uri Pincas - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (2):337-359.
A Blueprint for Affective Computing: A Sourcebook and Manual.Klaus R. Scherer, Tanja Bänziger & Etienne Roesch (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Computing machines can't be intelligent (...And Turing said so).Peter Kugel - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (4):563-579.
On the difficulty of really considering a radical novelty.Derek Partridge - 1995 - Minds and Machines 5 (3):391-410.
Computing in the philosophy of science.P. Thagard - 2004 - In L. Floridi (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Blackwell. pp. 307--317.
Recent Developments in Computing and Philosophy.Anthony F. Beavers - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):385-397.
The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information.Luciano Floridi (ed.) - 2003 - Blackwell.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Computing and Experiments: A Methodological View on the Debate on the Scientific Nature of Computing.Viola Schiaffonati & Mario Verdicchio - 2014 - Philosophy and Technology 27 (3):359-376.
Stretching the Traditional Notion of Experiment in Computing: Explorative Experiments.Viola Schiaffonati - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):647-665.
Abstraction and Idealization in the Formal Verification of Software Systems.Nicola Angius - 2013 - Minds and Machines 23 (2):211-226.
Building General Knowledge of Mechanisms in Information Security.Jonathan M. Spring & Phyllis Illari - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (4):627-659.
References found in this work
The Sciences of the Artificial.Herbert Alexander Simon - 1969 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: [Cambridge, M.I.T. Press.