Dutch Protocols for Deliberately Ending the Life of Newborns: A Defence

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (2):251-259 (2017)

Authors
Matthew Tedesco
Beloit College
Abstract
The Groningen Protocol, introduced in the Netherlands in 2005 and accompanied by revised guidelines published in a report commissioned by the Royal Dutch Medical Association in 2014, specifies conditions under which the lives of severely ill newborns may be deliberately ended. Its publication came four years after the Netherlands became the first nation to legalize the voluntary active euthanasia of adults, and the Netherlands remains the only country to offer a pathway to protecting physicians who might engage in deliberately ending the life of a newborn. In this paper, I offer two lines of argument. The first is a positive argument for the Protocol, grounded in the good of the newborn as unanimously determined by those in a position to determine it. The second addresses the widely shared belief that the killing of newborns is morally prohibited, where I offer two arguments—one grounded in the fact that the kinds of cases the Protocol is meant to govern are very rare and highly unusual, and the other focused more broadly on the role of pre-theoretical beliefs in moral reasoning—meant to undermine the strong role that the critic of the Protocol affords this belief. I argue that, given this second line of argument, the beliefs underlying my positive argument for the Protocol are in fact more secure than the widely shared belief underlying the critic’s position.
Keywords Euthanasia  Infanticide  Groningen
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-017-9772-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,253
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics and Intuitions.Peter Singer - 2005 - Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):331-352.
How Does Moral Judgment Work?Joshua Greene & Jonathan Haidt - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):517-523.
Practical Ethics.John Martin Fischer & Peter Singer - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):264.
Abortion and Infanticide.Michael Tooley - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1):37-65.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Shifts in the Direction of Dutch Bioethics: Forward or Backward?Gerrit K. Kimsma & Evert van Leeuwen - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (3):292-297.
The Groningen Protocol: Another Perspective.A. B. Jotkowitz - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):157-158.
Killing Fetuses and Killing Newborns.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):19-20.
Euthanasia - a Dutch Perspective.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2010 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (4):4.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-21

Total views
16 ( #529,385 of 2,269,762 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #422,367 of 2,269,762 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature