Language learning, power laws, and sexual selection

Mind and Society 7 (1):65-76 (2008)
Abstract
I discuss the ubiquity of power law distributions in language organisation (and elsewhere), and argue against Miller’s (The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature, William Heinemann, London, 2000) argument that large vocabulary size is a consequence of sexual selection. Instead I argue that power law distributions are evidence that languages are best modelled as dynamical systems but raise some issues for models of iterated language learning
Keywords Zipf curve  Iterated learning model  Small world distribution  Evolutionary linguistics  Diathesis alternation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11299-007-0040-8
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Semi-Productive Polysemy and Sense Extension.Ann Copestake & Ted Briscoe - 1995 - Journal of Semantics 12 (1):15-67.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-10

Total downloads

11 ( #407,077 of 2,178,112 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,112 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums