Mind and Society 7 (1):65-76 (2008)

Abstract
I discuss the ubiquity of power law distributions in language organisation (and elsewhere), and argue against Miller’s (The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature, William Heinemann, London, 2000) argument that large vocabulary size is a consequence of sexual selection. Instead I argue that power law distributions are evidence that languages are best modelled as dynamical systems but raise some issues for models of iterated language learning
Keywords Zipf curve  Iterated learning model  Small world distribution  Evolutionary linguistics  Diathesis alternation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11299-007-0040-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Semi-Productive Polysemy and Sense Extension.Ann Copestake & Ted Briscoe - 1995 - Journal of Semantics 12 (1):15-67.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Critical Notice.Mohan Matthen - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):337-356.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
25 ( #440,097 of 2,455,480 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,480 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes