In Otavio Bueno & Ali Abasnezhad (eds.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science 33: On the Sorites Paradox. New York: Springer (forthcoming)

Authors
Ted Everett
State University of New York at Geneseo
Abstract
When you and I seriously argue over whether a man of seventy is old enough to count as an "old man", it seems that we are appealing neither to our own separate standards of oldness nor to a common standard that is already fixed in the language. Instead, it seems that both of us implicitly invoke an ideal, shared standard that has yet to be agreed upon: the place where we ought to draw the line. As with other normative standards, it is hard to know whether such borderlines exist prior to our coming to agree on where they are. But epistemicists plausibly argue that they must exist whether we ever agree on them or not, as this provides the only logically acceptable response to the sorites paradox. This paper argues that such boundaries do typically exist as hypothetical ideals, but not as determinate features of the present actual world. There is in fact no general solution to the paradox, but attention to practice in resolving vague disagreements shows that its instances can be dealt with separately, as they arise, in many reasonable ways.
Keywords vagueness  sorites  disagreement  epistemicism  standards  gradability  paradox
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neutralism and the Observational Sorites Paradox.Patrick Greenough - forthcoming - In Ali Abasnezhad & Otavio Bueno (eds.), Synthese Special Edition. Springer.
A Topological Sorites.Zach Weber & Mark Colyvan - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (6):311-325.
Consonance and Dissonance in Solutions to the Sorites.Nicholas J. J. Smith - forthcoming - In Otavio Bueno & Ali Abasnezhad (eds.), On the Sorites Paradox. Springer.
Remarks on the Current Status of the Sorites Paradox.Richard Dewitt - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1):93.
Verities, the Sorites, and Theseus’ Ship.Igor Douven - 2017 - Synthese 194 (10):3867-3878.
Vagueness and Context-Relativity.Diana Raffman - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):175 - 192.
The Sorites Paradox.Dale A. Thorpe - 1984 - Synthese 61 (3):391 - 421.
A Note on the Sorites Paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):74 – 75.
Leibniz and the Sorites.Samuel Levey - 2002 - The Leibniz Review 12:25-49.
Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites.Ofra Magidor - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.
A Cognitive Neuroscience, Dual-Systems Approach to the Sorites Paradox.Leib Litman & Mark Zelcer - 2013 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 25 (3):355-366.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-12

Total views
97 ( #109,841 of 2,445,457 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #49,556 of 2,445,457 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes