AbstractBackground independence begins life as an informal property that a physical theory might have, often glossed as 'doesn't posit a fixed spacetime background'. Interest in trying to offer a precise account of background independence has been sparked by the pronouncements of several theorists working on quantum gravity that background independence embodies in some sense an essential discovery of the General Theory of Relativity, and a feature we should strive to carry forward to future physical theories. This paper has two goals. The first is to investigate what a world must be like in order to be truly described by a background independent theory given extant accounts of background independence. The second is to argue that there are no non-empirical reasons to be more confident in theories that satisfy extant accounts of background independence than in theories that don't. The paper concludes by drawing a general moral about a way in which focussing primarily on mathematical formulations of our physical theories can adversely affect debates in the metaphysics of physics.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Citations of this work
Holes in Spacetime: Some Neglected Essentials.Trevor Teitel - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy 116 (7):353-389.
Geometrical Constructivism and Modal Relationalism: Further Aspects of the Dynamical/Geometrical Debate.James Read - 2020 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 33 (1):23-41.
Similar books and articles
Background Independence, Diffeomorphism Invariance, and the Meaning of Coordinates.Oliver Pooley - 2015 - In Dennis Lehmkuhl (ed.), Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories. Birkhäuser.
General Covariance, Diffeomorphism Invariance, and Background Independence in 5 Dimensions.Antonio Vassallo - 2014 - In Tomasz Bigaj & Christian Wüthrich (eds.), Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Rodopi.
Who's Afraid of Background Independence?Dean Rickles - 2008 - In Dennis Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime II. Elsevier. pp. 133--52.
A Metaphysical Reflection on the Notion of Background in Modern Spacetime Physics.Antonio Vassallo - 2016 - In L. Felline, F. Paoli, E. Rossanese & A. Ledda (eds.), New Developments in Logic and Philosophy of Science. College Publications. pp. 349-365.
Can Bohmian Mechanics Be Made Background Independent?Antonio Vassallo - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part B):242-250.
Substantive General Covariance: Another Decade of Dispute.Oliver Pooley - 2009 - In Mauricio Suárez, Mauro Dorato & Miklós Rédei (eds.), EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association. Springer. pp. 197--209.
On Identifying Background-Structure in Classical Field Theories.Ryan Samaroo - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1070-1081.
Geometric Foundations of Classical Yang–Mills Theory.Gabriel Catren - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (3):511-531.
Some Remarks on the Notions of General Covariance and Background Independence.Domenico Giulini - 2007 - Lecture Notes in Physics 721:105--20.
Defining a Crisis: The Roles of Principles in the Search for a Theory of Quantum Gravity.Karen Crowther - forthcoming - Synthese 198 (Suppl 14):3489-3516.
The Implications of General Covariance for the Ontology and Ideology of Spacetime.John Earman - 2006 - In Dennis Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime. Elsevier. pp. 3--24.
No-Go Theorems Face Background-Based Theories for Quantum Mechanics.Louis Vervoort - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (4):458-472.