Authors
Trevor Teitel
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Abstract
Background independence begins life as an informal property that a physical theory might have, often glossed as 'doesn't posit a fixed spacetime background'. Interest in trying to offer a precise account of background independence has been sparked by the pronouncements of several theorists working on quantum gravity that background independence embodies in some sense an essential discovery of the General Theory of Relativity, and a feature we should strive to carry forward to future physical theories. This paper has two goals. The first is to investigate what a world must be like in order to be truly described by a background independent theory given extant accounts of background independence. The second is to argue that there are no non-empirical reasons to be more confident in theories that satisfy extant accounts of background independence than in theories that don't. The paper concludes by drawing a general moral about a way in which focussing primarily on mathematical formulations of our physical theories can adversely affect debates in the metaphysics of physics.
Keywords Background Independence  Diffeomorphism Invariance  General Covariance  Spacetime  Modality  Haecceitism  Relationism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.10.001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Writing the Book of the World.Theodore Sider - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Essence and Modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:1-16.
Against Grounding Necessitarianism.Alexander Skiles - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (4):717-751.
Humean Supervenience Debugged.David K. Lewis - 1994 - Mind 103 (412):473--490.
Against Parthood.Theodore Sider - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 8:237–293.

View all 54 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Holes in Spacetime: Some Neglected Essentials.Trevor Teitel - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy (7):353-389.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Background-Independence.Gordon Belot - 2011 - General Relativity and Gravitation 43:2865-2884.
Who's Afraid of Background Independence?Dean Rickles - 2008 - In Dennis Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime II. Elsevier. pp. 133--52.
A Metaphysical Reflection on the Notion of Background in Modern Spacetime Physics.Antonio Vassallo - 2016 - In L. Felline, F. Paoli, E. Rossanese & A. Ledda (eds.), New Developments in Logic and Philosophy of Science. College Publications. pp. 349-365.
Can Bohmian Mechanics Be Made Background Independent?Antonio Vassallo - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part B):242-250.
Structuralism in the Philosophy of Physics.Vincent Lam - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (6):e12421.
Geometric Foundations of Classical Yang–Mills Theory.Gabriel Catren - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (3):511-531.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-10-03

Total views
651 ( #7,676 of 2,350,068 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #6,891 of 2,350,068 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes