Philosophy 88 (1):55-79 (2013)

Authors
Chon Tejedor
Universitat de Valencia
Abstract
I defend a new interpretation of Wittgenstein's notion of religious attitude in the Tractatus , one that rejects three key views from the secondary literature: firstly, the view that, for Wittgenstein, the willing subject is a transcendental condition for the religious attitude; secondly, the view that the religious attitude is an emotive response to the world or something closely modelled on this notion of emotive response; and thirdly, the view that, although the religious and ethical pseudo-propositions of the Tractatus are nonsensical, they nevertheless succeed in expressing the religious attitude endorsed by Wittgenstein. In connection to the first, I argue that the notion of willing subject as transcendental condition is abandoned by Wittgenstein in the Notebooks and is no longer a feature of his position in the Tractatus . In connection to the second, I argue that the religious attitude is dispositional rather than emotive for Wittgenstein: it is a disposition to use signs in a way that demonstrates one's conceptual clarity. Finally, in connection to the third, I argue that the religious or ethical attitude is strongly ineffable in that it cannot be described, expressed or conveyed by language at all
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0031819112000538
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,864
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

I: A Lecture on Ethics.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):3-12.
Metaphysics and Nonsense.Warren Goldfarb - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22 (1):57-73.
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.D. F. Pears, B. F. Mcguinness & Bertrand Russell - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (2):264-265.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Ethical Significance of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.Jordi Fairhurst - 2021 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 2 (40):151-168.
‘Ethics is Transcendental’.Jordi Fairhurst - forthcoming - Journal of the American Philosophical Association:1-20.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and Religion.Michael Kober - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):87-116.
Three Religious Attitudes.Steven G. Smith - 1998 - Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):3-24.
Judging, Believing, and Taking.Ronald Ruegsegger - 1982 - Philosophy Research Archives 8:535-559.
A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.Max Black - 1964 - Cambridge University Press.
Faith, Hope and Doubt.Louis Pojman - forthcoming - Philosophy of Religion.
Wittgenstein's Notion of 'Theology as Grammar'.Michael G. Harvey - 1989 - Religious Studies 25 (1):89 - 103.
Wittgenstein and Criteria.Elizabeth H. Wolgast - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):348 – 366.
Husserl's Phenomenological Discovery of the Natural Attitude.Sebastian Luft - 1998 - Continental Philosophy Review 31 (2):153-170.
Wittgenstein and the Life of Signs.Jim Hopkins - 2004 - In Max Kölbel & Bernhard Weiss (eds.), Wittgenstein's Lasting Significance. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-05

Total views
30 ( #354,096 of 2,433,129 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #213,666 of 2,433,129 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes