European Journal of Philosophy 28 (4):926-941 (2020)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
A neglected and non-trivial problem exists for a central cluster of Strawsonian accountability theories of moral responsibility, namely those that, following Gary Watson, understand the reactive attitudes to be implicit forms of moral address, particularly moral demand. The problem consists in the joint acceptance of two claims: (a) Accountability is a matter of agents holding one another to moral demands, and (b) accountability is a view of blame and praise. I label joint acceptance of these claims the Strawsonian’s demand dogma. Symptomatic of a larger tendency among responsibility theorists to focus on blame to the neglect of its positive counterpart, the demand dogma saddles the Strawsonian with an impoverished and ultimately untenable view of praise. This is because moral demand occupies a dual role on the Strawsonian's view of blame, one that it is incapable of occupying for praise. For, demands figure not only in the contents of blame responses; demand typifies the form of these responses themselves. That is, reactive attitudes of blame, unlike those of praise, implicitly make demands of their targets. The force of this problem is highlighted by considering the inadequacy of various strategies for shoehorning “demand” into our conception of praise. If reactive attitudes generally are incipient forms of moral address, praise-manifesting attitudes must communicate something other than demand. Though primarily critical, this paper invites Strawsonian responsibility theorists to give renewed attention to the foundations of the proposal that the reactive attitudes are incipiently communicative, focusing this time on the form of address that lies at the heart of praise.
|
Keywords | Moral Address Reactive Attitudes P.F. Strawson Praise Blame |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/ejop.12527 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life.Angela M. Smith - 2005 - Ethics 115 (2):236-271.
View all 41 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Praise as Moral Address.Daniel Telech - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility 7.
The Communication Argument and the Pluralist Challenge.Shawn Tinghao Wang - 2021 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51 (5):384-399.
Similar books and articles
The Limits of Evil and the Role of Moral Address: A Defense of Strawsonian Compatibilism. [REVIEW]Michael S. McKenna - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (2):123-142.
The Dilemma of Accountability for Professionals: A Challenge for Mainstream Management Theories.Maliheh Mansouri & Julie I. Adair Rowney - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 123 (1):1-12.
Responsibility, Reactive Attitudes and Free Will: Reflections on Wallace’s Theory.Robert Kane - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):693-698.
Responsibility, Reactive Attitudes and Free Will: Reflections on Wallace’s Theory. [REVIEW]Robert Kane - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):693–698.
Strawsonian Libertarianism: A Theory of Free Will and Moral Responsibility.Christopher Franklin - unknown
Education, Accountability, and the Ethical Demand: Can the Democratic Potential of Accountability Be Regained?Gert J. J. Biesta - 2004 - Educational Theory 54 (3):233-250.
The Nature of the Gift: Accountability and the Professor‐Student Relationship.Ana M. Martínez‐Alemán - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (6):574–591.
On the Formalization of Strawson's Presupposition.Jacek Malinowski - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):111-118.
Redefining Accountability As Relational Responsiveness.Mollie Painter-Morland - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):89-98.
Cartesians, Strawsonians and the Univocal Meaning of Mental Predicates.Yakir Levin - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (32):91-106.
Revisiting Strawsonian Arguments From Inescapability.Szigeti Andras - 2012 - Philosophica 85 (2):91-121.
The Nature of the Gift: Accountability and the Professor‐Student Relationship.Ana M. Martínez‐Alemán - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (6):574-591.
Rethinking Demandingness: Why Satisficing Consequentialism and Scalar Consequentialism Are Not Less Demanding Than Maximizing Consequentialism.Spencer Case - 2016 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 10 (1):1-8.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-02-22
Total views
63 ( #179,335 of 2,498,172 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #171,347 of 2,498,172 )
2020-02-22
Total views
63 ( #179,335 of 2,498,172 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #171,347 of 2,498,172 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads