The projection postulate: A new perspective

Philosophy of Science 51 (3):369-395 (1984)
Previous work has shown that the problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is not correctly seen as one of understanding some allegedly univocal process of measurement in nature which corresponds to the projection postulate. The present paper introduces a new perspective by showing that how we are to understand the nature of the change of quantum mechanical state on measurement depends very sensitively on the interpretation of the state function, and by showing how attention to this dependence can greatly sharpen the problems and relations between them. In particular, the problems take a form resembling their traditional formulation only on an inexact value interpretation, according to which the state function attributes inexact values of quantities to systems. On other interpretations we can apply (with various drawbacks) the subensemble idea, according to which a discontinuous change of quantum mechanical description results on measurement simply because we need a new state function to describe a new object
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289190
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,711
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Schrödinger's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Relevance of Bohr's Experimental Critique.Slobodan Perovic - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (2):275-297.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Measurements and Quantum States: Part II.Henry Margenau - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (2):138-157.
Quantum Logic and the Projection Postulate.Geoffrey Hellman - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):469-486.
Is There Really No Projection Postulate in the Modal Interpretation?W. Michael Dickson - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (2):197-218.
The Projection Postulate and Bohr's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Paul Teller - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:201-223.
Von Neumann's Argument for the Projection Postulate.Joseph D. Sneed - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):22-39.
The Projection Postulate as a Fortuitous Approximation.Paul Teller - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):413-431.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

13 ( #340,344 of 2,146,261 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,504 of 2,146,261 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums