Being Good in a World of Need: Some Empirical Worries and an Uncomfortable Philosophical Possibility

Journal of Practical Ethics 7 (1):1-23 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this article, I present some worries about the possible impact of global efforts to aid the needy in some of the world’s most desperate regions. Among the worries I address are possible unintended negative consequences that may occur elsewhere in a society when aid agencies hire highly qualified local people to promote their agendas; the possibility that foreign interests and priorities may have undue influence on a country’s direction and priorities, negatively impacting local authority and autonomy; and the related problem of outside interventions undermining the responsiveness of local and national governments to their citizens. Another issue I discuss is the possibility that efforts to aid the needy may involve an Each-We Dilemma, in which case conflicts may arise between what is individually rational or moral, and what is collectively rational or moral. Unfortunately, it is possible that if each of us does what we have most reason to do, morally, in aiding the needy, we together will bring about an outcome which is worse, morally, in terms of its overall impact on the global needy. The article ends by briefly noting a number of claims and arguments that I made in my 2017 Uehiro Lectures regarding how good people should respond in a world of need. As I have long argued, I have no doubt that those who are well off are open to serious moral criticism if they ignore the plight of the needy. Unfortunately, however, for a host of both empirical and philosophical reasons, what one should do in light of that truth is much more complex, and murky, than most people have realized.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aid Scepticism and Effective Altruism.William MacAskill - 2019 - Journal of Practical Ethics 7 (1):49-60.
Each-We Dilemmas and Effective Altruism.Theron Pummer & Matthew Clark - 2019 - Journal of Practical Ethics 7 (1):24-32.
The Moral Demands of Affluence.Garrett Cullity - 2004 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Thinking about the Needy: A Reprise.Larry S. Temkin - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (4):409-458.
Thinking about the needy: A reprise. [REVIEW]Larry S. Temkin - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (4):409 - 458.
Introduction to the Symposium on The Most Good You Can Do.Anthony Skelton - 2016 - Journal of Global Ethics 12 (2):127-131.
Global justice in the shadow of security threats.Yuchun Kuo - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (7):884-905.
Can arguments address concerns?M. Hayry - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (10):598-600.


Added to PP

807 (#19,403)

6 months
85 (#57,223)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Larry Temkin
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Effective Justice.Roger Crisp & Theron Pummer - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (4):398-415.
Each-We Dilemmas and Effective Altruism.Theron Pummer & Matthew Clark - 2019 - Journal of Practical Ethics 7 (1):24-32.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references