Analysis 66 (289):32–35 (2006)
In his book Bayes or Bust?, John Earman (1992: 63–65) seeks to set out the Bayesian reasoning that would vindicate the pre-theoretic intuition that a theory receives conﬁrmation from having its observational predictions borne out by experience.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Irrelevance of Philosophy.Vincent G. Potter - 1974 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):145-155.
Deep Ecology and the Irrelevance of Morality: A Response.Mathew Humphrey - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (1):75-79.
Deep Ecology and the Irrelevance of Morality.Mathew Humphrey - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (1):75-79.
Moral Responsibility and the Irrelevance of Physics: Fischer's Semi-Compatibilism Vs. Anti-Fundamentalism. [REVIEW]Helen Steward - 2008 - Journal of Ethics 12 (2):129 - 145.
Aquinas' Reasons for the Aesthetic Irrelevance of Tastes and Smells.Neil Campbell - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (2):166-176.
The Irrelevance of Philosophical Treatments of Affirmative Action.J. Ralph Lindgren - 1981 - Social Theory and Practice 7 (1):1-19.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads70 ( #72,963 of 2,153,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #225,089 of 2,153,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?