Both perception and imagination seem to play a crucial role in our engagement with fiction films but whether they really do so, and which role they possibly play, is controversial. On the one hand, a fiction film, as film, is a depiction that invites us to perceive the events portrayed. On the other hand, as fiction, it invites us to imagine the story told. Thus, after watching the film Alien, one might say that one saw Ripley fighting the monster but one might also say that one imagined Ripley fighting the monster. Are these two reports compatible? If they are, how can we combine them so to make sense of them? If, instead, they are not, which of them should we give up?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0007.005
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Do We See in Film?Robert Hopkins - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):149–159.
Lived Experience and Meaning in the Cinematic World.David Macgregor Johnston - 2000 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Kant Im Kino.Jihae Chung - 2015 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 63 (1).
Is Make-Believe Only Reproduction?Michela Summa - 2019 - Social Imaginaries 5 (1):97-119.
The Real in Film and Its Impact.Juraj Oniscenko - 2011 - Filozofia 66 (7):655-666.


Added to PP index

Total views
83 ( #129,506 of 2,448,711 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #34,582 of 2,448,711 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes