Philosophical Inquiry 43 (3-4):2-19 (2019)

This study is a comparative investigation of Proclus’ and Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite’s positions about “remaining” as demonstrative of the ontological monism. Focusing the attention, first of all, to the Neoplatonist philosopher, who represents polytheism, it comes that “remaining” indicates the state of standstill and unchangeability of those beings which are able to function as productive principles. Thus, a transcendental and a productive plane are identified, a parameter which combines the apophatic with the affirmative approaches. The theory about “unparticipated-participated-participating” brings to the light a middle phase between “remaining” and “procession”, in order the relation “one-multitude” to develop. In Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, “remaining” appears in two planes: a) the transcendent One, which does not take part in the production process, b) the One which includes all the beings in the form of archetypical reasons. Note that this is not an eternal co-existence or an ontological identification of the beings with the One’s substance or a transition from the first One to the second, as Proclus suggests. Pseudo-Dionysius just describes the providential function of the One, which is manifested owing to its goodness. In conclusion, the main difference between the two thinkers is how they conceive the notion of “metaphysical multitude”: in Proclus, it indicates a hierarchy of beings, while, in Pseudo-Dionysius, it expresses the inner richness of the unity. In both the worldviews though, the ontological prospect which is formed is actually an optimistic one.
Keywords Ancient Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1105-235X
DOI 10.5840/philinquiry2019433/416
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,262
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Main Features Social Ontology in the Frame of Areopahityk.A. Shatalovich - 2013 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 2 (23):280-284.
Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.Mark Lamarre - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.Michael Harrington & Kevin Corrigan - 2004 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pseudo-Dionysius on the Processes of Negation.Tomás N. Castro - 2015 - Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of Postgraduates in Ancient Literature 2:1-11.
Interpreting Proclus: From Antiquity to the Renaissance Ed. By Stephen Gersh.Daniel O'Connell - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (3):499-500.
Proclus’ Prolegomena on the Ontological Status of Time.Christos Terezis & Elias Tempelis - 2014 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 17 (1):27-47.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,044,296 of 2,455,770 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #143,415 of 2,455,770 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes