Res Publica 28 (2):271-301 (2022)

Authors
Francesco Testini
University of Milan
Abstract
In this paper, I argue that one approach to normative political theory, namely contextualism, can benefit from a specific kind of historical inquiry, namely genealogy, because the latter provides a solution to a deep-seated problem for the former. This problem consists in a lack of critical distance and originates from the justificatory role that contextualist approaches attribute to contextual facts. I compare two approaches to genealogical reconstruction, namely the historiographical method pioneered by Foucault and the hybrid method of pragmatic genealogy as practiced by Bernard Williams, arguing that they both ensure an increase in critical distance while preserving contextualism’s distinctiveness. I also show, however, that only the latter provides normative action-guidance and can thus assist the contextualist theorist in the crucial task of discerning how far certain contextual facts deserve their justificatory role. I prove this point by showing how a pragmatic genealogy of the practice of punishment can inform the contextualist’s reflection about the role this practice should play in a transitional scenario, i.e. in the set of circumstances societies go through in the aftermath of large-scale violence and human rights violations.
Keywords Contextualism in political theory  Methodology of political theory  Genealogy  Pragmatic genealogy  Punishment  Transitional justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-021-09515-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.

View all 61 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Problem of Punishment.David Boonin - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Contextualism Reconsidered: Some Skeptical Reflections. [REVIEW]Chandran Kukathas - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (2):215-225.
Why Should We Care What the Public Thinks? A Critical Assessment of the Claims of Popular Punishment.Frej Klem Thomsen - 2014 - In Jesper Ryberg & Julian Roberts (eds.), Popular Punishment. Oxford University Press. pp. 119-145.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-08-10

Total views
42 ( #270,021 of 2,507,805 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #20,909 of 2,507,805 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes