In Christian Kock & Lisa Villadsen (ed.), Rhetorical Citizenship and Public Deliberation (pp. 77-92). Pennsylvania State University Press (2012)
Deliberative politics should start from an adequate and differentiated image of our dialogical practices and their normative structures; the ideals that we eventually propose for deliberative politics should be tested against this background. In this article I will argue that equal respect, understood as respect a priori conferred on persons, is not and should not be counted as a constitutive normative ground of public discourse. Furthermore, requiring such respect, even if it might facilitate dialogue, could have negative effects and lead to fallacious paths of thought –as seems to happen on matters of deep disagreement such as the Colorado Fundamentalist/Gay HIV issue I discuss in paragraph 6. I will put forward this argument from the standpoint of argumentation or discourse theory, drawing consequences for dialogical theories of politics. Basing my argument on a pluralistic notion of public discourse – understood as a mixed discourse of persuasion, information-seeking and negotiation – I will argue that respect is a dynamic, situational phenomenon, and that the norm of equal respect for persons is contextually contingent in political deliberation: equal respect should be considered as a potential outcome, a discursive achievement – which I understand as a second order consensus achieved dynamically on a provisional basis – rather than as an universal condition for dialogue.
|Keywords||Deliberative Democracy Argumentation Theory Citizenship Respect Disagreement Consent John Dryzek Juergen Habermas Discourse Theory Stephen Darwall|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Second-Personal Respect, the Experiential Aspect of Respect, and Feminist Philosophy.Amanda Roth - 2010 - Hypatia 25 (2):316 - 333.
Precedent Autonomy and Subsequent Consent.John K. Davis - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):267-291.
No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere.John S. Brady - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):331-354.
Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Hugh Baxter - 2011 - Stanford Law Books.
Means, Ends, and Public Ignorance in Habermas's Theory of Democracy.Matthew Weinshall - 2000 - Critical Review 15 (1-2):23-58.
Is Common Ground a Word or Just a Sound? Second Order Consensus and Argumentation Theory.Cantù Paola & Testa Italo - 2007 - In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. OSSA.
The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability.Stephen L. Darwall - 2006 - Harvard University Press.
Kant, Respect and Injustice: The Limits of Liberal Moral Theory.Victor J. Seidler - 1986 - Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kant on Respect, Dignity, and the Duty of Respect.Stephen Darwall - 2008 - In Monika Betzler (ed.), Kant's Ethics of Virtues. De Gruyter.
The Rhetoric of Deliberation: Some Problems in Kantian Theories of Deliberative Democracy.John O'Neill - 2002 - Res Publica 8 (3):249-268.
Added to index2011-11-07
Total downloads109 ( #45,184 of 2,164,541 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #12,547 of 2,164,541 )
How can I increase my downloads?