Languages of thought need to be distinguished from learning mechanisms, and nothing yet rules out multiple distinctively human learning systems

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):148-149 (2008)
We distinguish the question whether only human minds are equipped with a language of thought (LoT) from the question whether human minds employ a single uniquely human learning mechanism. Thus separated, our answer to both questions is negative. Even very simple minds employ a LoT. And the comparative data reviewed by Penn et al. actually suggest that there are many distinctively human learning mechanisms
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X08003749
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,495
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate.Barrett H. Clark & Kurzban Robert - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (3):628-647.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
So, Are We the Massively Lucky Species?Derek C. Penn, Keith J. Holyoak & Daniel J. Povinelli - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4):236-237.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
30 ( #182,549 of 2,210,574 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #356,847 of 2,210,574 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature