Languages of thought need to be distinguished from learning mechanisms, and nothing yet rules out multiple distinctively human learning systems

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):148-149 (2008)
We distinguish the question whether only human minds are equipped with a language of thought (LoT) from the question whether human minds employ a single uniquely human learning mechanism. Thus separated, our answer to both questions is negative. Even very simple minds employ a LoT. And the comparative data reviewed by Penn et al. actually suggest that there are many distinctively human learning mechanisms
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X08003749
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,621
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
So, Are We the Massively Lucky Species?Derek C. Penn, Keith J. Holyoak & Daniel J. Povinelli - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4):236-237.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

30 ( #170,954 of 2,169,095 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,850 of 2,169,095 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums