An Analysis of Words and Phrases Characteristic of the Gospel of Matthew

Dissertation, Southern Methodist University (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify characteristic phrases of the Gospel of Matthew and to provide a data base for determining which phrases are characteristic of the final redactor. The results of this study can be used by redaction critics working with the Gospel of Matthew, text critics, and those scholars engaged in the study of the synoptic problem. By taking a neutral position on the question of the synoptic problem, this study is able to identify a larger number of characteristic phrases than has been identified in other studies. ;This study begins with the assumption that a writer has a preference for certain words, phrases, and grammatical constructions and that careful analysis of what he has written will reveal his characteristic ways of expressing himself. However, only those characteristic phrases that are distinctive with respect to their use by other New Testament writers have been included in this study. Each phrase which has been determined to be sufficiently distinctive that it seems likely that all the occurrences of that phrase in the Gospel of Matthew come from the same writer is then listed in one of five categories, each of which is important for determining which phrases are characteristic of the final redactor. These include: words and phrases which occur in passages that have been identified as functioning redactionally; words and phrases which occur in the same immediate context as words and phrases which occur in passages that function redactionally; words and phrases which are at least fairly well distributed and occur in different kinds of material ; words and phrases that occur in only one kind of material; and words and phrases that are not well distributed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Utterance meaning and syntactic ellipsis.Robert J. Stainton - 1997 - Pragmatics and Cognition 5 (1):51-78.
Complement Polyvalence and Permutation in English.Brendan S. Gillon - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (3):275-285.
Non-Sentential Assertions.Robert James Harold Stainton - 1993 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Ambiguity.Kent Bach - manuscript
On some proposals for the semantics of mass nouns.Francis Jeffry Pelletier - 1974 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1/2):87 - 108.
“Weasel Words” in Legal and Diplomatic Discourse: Vague Nouns and Phrases in UN Resolutions Relating to the Second Gulf War.Giuseppina Scotto di Carlo - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (3):559-576.
Parasitic degree phrases.Jon Nissenbaum & Bernhard Schwarz - 2011 - Natural Language Semantics 19 (1):1-38.
Homeric Epithets For Things.D. H. F. Geay - 1947 - Classical Quarterly 41 (3-4):109-.
Phrases nominales énonciatives et phrases verbales.Gérold Stahl - 1991 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 181 (3):329 - 334.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references