Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt1):61-82 (2009)

Authors
Mark Textor
King's College London
Abstract
Frege holds the distinction between complete (saturated) and incomplete (unsaturated) things to be a basic distinction of logic. Many disagree. In this paper I will argue that one can defend Frege's distinction against criticism if one takes, inspired by Frege, a wh -question to be the paradigm incomplete expression.
Keywords Frege  Unsaturatedness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2009.00258.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,715
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reference and Generality.P. T. Geach - 1962 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Regress, Unity, Facts, and Propositions.Matti Eklund - 2019 - Synthese 196 (4):1225-1247.
Frege’s Unmanageable Thing.Michael Price - 2018 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (3):368-413.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-03-24

Total views
124 ( #76,259 of 2,386,854 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #159,276 of 2,386,854 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes