Capitalization in the St. Petersburg game Why statistical distributions matter

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (3):292-313 (2014)
Authors
Mariam Thalos
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Abstract
In spite of its infinite expectation value, the St. Petersburg game is not only a gamble without supply in the real world, but also one without demand at apparently very reasonable asking prices. We offer a rationalizing explanation of why the St. Petersburg bargain is unattractive on both sides (to both house and player) in the mid-range of prices (finite but upwards of about $4). Our analysis – featuring (1) the already-established fact that the average of finite ensembles of the St. Petersburg game grows with ensemble size but is unbounded, and (2) our own simulation data showing that the debt-to-entry fee ratio rises exponentially – explains why both house and player are quite rational in abstaining from the St. Petersburg game. The house will be unavoidably (and intentionally) exposed to very large ensembles (with very high averages, and so very costly to them), while contrariwise even the well-heeled player is not sufficiently capitalized (as our simulation data reveals) to be able to capture the potential gains from large-ensemble play. (Smaller ensembles, meanwhile, enjoy low means, as others have shown, and so are not worth paying more than $4 to play, even if a merchant were to offer them at such low prices per trial.) Both sides are consequently rational in abstaining from entry into the St. Petersburg market in the mid-range of asking prices. We utilize the concept of capitalization vis-à-vis a gamble to make this case. Classical analyses of this question have paid insufficient attention to the question of the propriety of using expected values to assess the St. Petersburg gamble. And extant analyses have not noted the average-maximum-debt-before-breaking-even figures, and so are incomplete
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
DOI 10.1177/1470594X13491792
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,097
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Model Uncertainty and Policy Choice: A Plea for Integrated Subjectivism.Alistair M. C. Isaac - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:42-50.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Complex Expectations.Alan Hájek & Harris Nover - 2008 - Mind 117 (467):643 - 664.
Vexing Expectations.Harris Nover & Alan Hájek - 2004 - Mind 113 (450):237-249.
Perplexing Expectations.Alan Hájek & Harris Nover - 2006 - Mind 115 (459):703 - 720.
On the Normative Dimension of St. Petersburg Paradox.David Teira - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2):210-23.
The St. Petersburg Gamble and Risk.Paul Weirich - 1984 - Theory and Decision 17 (2):193-202.
Divide-the-Dollar Game Revisited.Nejat Anbarci - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (4):295-303.
Variations on a Game of Gale (I): Coding Strategies.Marion Scheepers - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (3):1035-1043.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-06-14

Total views
95 ( #71,833 of 2,313,468 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #134,525 of 2,313,468 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature