Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):301-315 (2005)
Abstract |
Recently, James Smith and Merold Westphal have sought to reconcile Christianity with Lyotard’s definition of the postmodern – “incredulitytowards metanarratives” – by claiming that Christianity is not a metanarrative in Lyotard’s sense. This paper argues that their understanding of theLyotardian metanarrative is too restrictive, and that the term specifically includes Christianity within its scope. Despite this, though, there is a meansby which Christianity and Lyotard can be brought closer together. That method is to understand Lyotard’s refusal of metanarratives as being tosome extent provisional. Combining this idea with Lyotard’s notion of the differend allows Christianity and Lyotardian postmodernism to be found, ifnot in agreement, at least to coexist
|
Keywords | Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0739-7046 |
DOI | 10.5840/faithphil20052234 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Political Ethics of Jean-François Lyotard and Jacques Derrida.Georges de Schrijver - 2010 - Peeters.
Lyotard and Irigaray: Challenging the (White) Male Philosophical Metanarrative Voice.George Yancy - 2002 - Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (4):563–580.
The Philosophical Politics of Jean-Franqois Lyotard.Tim Jordan - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (3):267-285.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
52 ( #219,946 of 2,518,718 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,718 )
2009-01-28
Total views
52 ( #219,946 of 2,518,718 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,718 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads