Journal of Indian Philosophy 40 (4):427-452 (2012)

Sonam Thakchoe
University of Tasmania
Buddhist semantic realists assert that reality is always non-linguistic, beyond the domain of conceptual thought. Anything that is conceptual and linguistic, they maintain, cannot be reality and therefore cannot function as reality.The Pra¯san˙gika however rejects the realist theory and argues that all realities are purely linguistic—just names and concepts—and that only linguistic reality can have any causal function. This paper seeks to understand the Pra¯san˙gika’s radical semantic nominalism and its philosophical justifications by comparing and contrasting it with the realistic semantic theories.
Keywords Buddhist philosophy of language  Semantic nominalism  Ontology  Universals  Unique particulars
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10781-012-9160-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

New Dimensions in Jaina Logic.Nathmal Mahaprajña & Tatia - 1984 - Today and Tommorrow's [Sic] Printers and Publishers.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
643 ( #9,716 of 2,439,081 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #23,377 of 2,439,081 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes