Satisfying Individual Desires or Moral Standards? Preferential Treatment and Group Members’ Self-Worth, Affect, and Behavior

Journal of Business Ethics 113 (1):133-145 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We investigate how social comparison processes in leader treatment quality impact group members’ self-worth, affect, and behavior. Evidences from the field and the laboratory suggest that employees who are treated kinder and more considerate than their fellow group members experience more self-worth and positive affect. Moreover, the greater positive self-implications of preferentially treated group members motivate them more strongly to comply with norms and to engage in tasks that benefit the group. These findings suggest that leaders face an ethical trade-off between satisfying the moral standard of treating everybody equally well and satisfying individual group members’ desire to be treated better than others

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Development.Kurt Baier - 1974 - The Monist 58 (4):601-615.
A Justification of Preferential Treatment.Robert William Brimlow - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester
The Moral Agency of Group Agents.Christopher Thompson - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (3):517-538.
Group agency and supervenience.Philip Pettit - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):85-105.
The paradox of group autonomy.Christopher Heath Wellman - 2003 - Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2):265-285.
Puzzling about State Excuses as an Instance of Group Excuses.François Tanguay-Renaud - forthcoming - In R. A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. Marshall & V. Tadros (eds.), The Constitution of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
The Kantian Moral Worth of Actions Contrary to Duty.Samuel J. Kerstein - 1999 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 53 (4):530 - 552.
Group Agents and Their Responsibility.Raimo Tuomela & Pekka Mäkelä - 2016 - The Journal of Ethics 20 (1-3):299-316.
Can Nonhuman Primates Read Minds?Joëlle Proust - 1999 - Philosophical Topics 27 (1):203-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-29

Downloads
48 (#316,781)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Grundlegung zur metaphysik der sitten.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - Gotha,: L. Klotz. Edited by Rudolf Otto.
Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten.Immanuel Kant & Karl Vorländer - 1908 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 65:217-217.

Add more references