- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice
Journal of Philosophy 75 (2):76-92 (1978)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Paul Thagard e a inferência da melhor explicação.Marcos Rodrigues da Silva - 2017 - Cognitio 18 (1):125.
Paul Thagard , The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change . Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Eran Asoulin - 2013 - Philosophy in Review 33 (5):415-417.
The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change, by Paul Thagard.: Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Wesley Buckwalter - 2013 - Mind 122 (488):1201-1204.
Thagard, Paul., The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change.Paolo C. Biondi - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (3):605-607.
Paul Thagard: The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change.Karl S. Rosengren - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (8):2041-2045.
The cognitive science of Feynmen: Paul Thagard: The cognitive science of science: Explanation, discovery, and conceptual change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012, 376pp, $40.00, £27.95 HB. [REVIEW]Sanjay Chandrasekharan - 2013 - Metascience 22 (3):647-652.
Paul Thagard, Conceptual Revolutions. [REVIEW]Alexander Rueger - 1992 - Philosophy in Review 12 (6):433-435.
The Epistemic Costs and Benefits of Collaboration.Don Fallis - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):197-208.
Apresentação: Paul Thagard e a revolução química de Lavoisier.Marcos Rodrigues da Silva & Miriam Giro - 2007 - Princípios 14 (22):261-263.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
458 (#70,815)
6 months
32 (#123,477)
2009-01-28
Downloads
458 (#70,815)
6 months
32 (#123,477)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The material theory of induction.John D. Norton - 2021 - Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press.
Which Models of Scientific Explanation Are (In)Compatible with Inference to the Best Explanation?Yunus Prasetya - 2024 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 75 (1):209-232.
Inference to the Best explanation.Peter Lipton - 2005 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos, The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge. pp. 193.
Explanatory coherence (plus commentary).Paul Thagard - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):435-467.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6dc498764b-4tfbx uwo