Ungovernable: reassessing Foucault’s ethics in light of Agamben’s Pauline conception of use
International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 77 (3):191-218 (2016)
Abstract
ABSTRACTIn the final volume of his Homo Sacer series, The use of bodies, Agamben claims that for Foucault ethics never escapes the horizon of governmentality and therefore his conception of ethics is ‘strategic.’ In light of this criticism, motivated by Agamben’s Pauline conception of ‘use,’ we reassess the status and function of ethics in Foucault’s late lectures. We investigate how Foucault’s approach to ethics develops from his treatment of liberal governmentality and also how its methodological foundation is developed in an interpretation of truth-telling in Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex. Our interpretation emphasizes the ambiguous status of ethics in Foucault’s late work: on the one hand, Agamben is right that Foucault assigns an irreducible strategic function to ethics thereby connecting it intrinsically to governmentality. On the other hand, Agamben overlooks how Foucault’s interpretation of Sophocles implies a conception of governmentality which emphasizes how ethical practices cannot be captured solely in strategic terms. Foucault’s ‘anarcheological’ approach thus articulates a dimension of ethics that remains, using Agamben’s own terms, ‘ungovernable’ and therefore also genuinely creative. Even so, Foucault’s approach to ethics remains in Agamben’s perspective on the deepest level faced with an antinomy that Agamben seeks to mediate with his Pauline conception of ‘inoperativity.’Author Profiles
DOI
10.1080/21692327.2016.1235987
My notes
Similar books and articles
Agamben's Sovereign Legalization of Foucault.Tom Frost - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (3):545-577.
Giorgio Agamben.Benjamin S. Pryor - 2011 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):65-78.
One Paradigm, Two Potentialities: Freedom, Sovereignty and Foucault in Agamben's Reading of Aristotle's 'δύναμις' ( dynamis ).David Bleeden - 2010 - Foucault Studies 10:68-84.
On the “Perfect Time of Human Experience”: Agamben and Foucault.Benjamin S. Pryor - 2011 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):65-78.
The Allegory of the Cage: Foucault, Agamben, and the Enlightenment.Arne de Boever - 2010 - Foucault Studies 10:7-22.
Foucault’s and Arendt’s ‘insider view’ of biopolitics: a critique of Agamben.Claire Blencowe - 2010 - History of the Human Sciences 23 (5):113-130.
Host publication information.Sverre Raffnsøe, Alain Beaulieu, Sam Binkley, Patricia Clough, Jens Erik Kristensen, Sven Opitz, Jyoti Puri, Alan Rosenberg, Marius T. Gudmand-Høyer & Ditte Vilstrup Holm - 2013 - Foucault Studies 15:1-3.
The care for the present: Giorgio Agamben's actualisation of the Pauline messianic experience.Job de Meyere - 2009 - Bijdragen 70 (2):168-184.
Critical Encounter Between Giorgio Agamben and Michel Foucault: Review of Recent Works of Agamben. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Bussolini - 2010 - Foucault Studies 10:108-143.
On the 'perfect time of human experience': Agamben and Foucault.Benjamin S. Pryor - 2008 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 53 (1):65-78.
Philosophical Archaeology in Kant, Foucault, and Agamben.Colin McQuillan - 2010 - Parrhesia 10:39-49.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-12-15
Downloads
9 (#938,252)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
2016-12-15
Downloads
9 (#938,252)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
References found in this work
Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life.Kalliopi Nikolopoulou, Giorgio Agamben & Daniel Heller-Roazen - 2000 - Substance 29 (3):124.
The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans.Giorgio Agamben - 2005 - Stanford University Press.