Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modelling
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):727-750 (2002)
AbstractIt is often assumed that similar domain-specific behavioural impairments found in cases of adult brain damage and developmental disorders correspond to similar underlying causes, and can serve as convergent evidence for the modular structure of the normal adult cognitive system. We argue that this correspondence is contingent on an unsupported assumption that atypical development can produce selective deficits while the rest of the system develops normally (Residual Normality), and that this assumption tends to bias data collection in the field. Based on a review of connectionist models of acquired and developmental disorders in the domains of reading and past tense, as well as on new simulations, we explore the computational viability of Residual Normality and the potential role of development in producing behavioural deficits. Simulations demonstrate that damage to a developmental model can produce very different effects depending on whether it occurs prior to or following the training process. Because developmental disorders typically involve damage prior to learning, we conclude that the developmental process is a key component of the explanation of endstate impairments in such disorders. Further simulations demonstrate that in simple connectionist learning systems, the assumption of Residual Normality is undermined by processes of compensation or alteration elsewhere in the system. We outline the precise computational conditions required for Residual Normality to hold in development, and suggest that in many cases it is an unlikely hypothesis. We conclude that in developmental disorders, inferences from behavioural deficits to underlying structure crucially depend on developmental conditions, and that the process of ontogenetic development cannot be ignored in constructing models of developmental disorders. Key Words: Acquired and developmental disorders; connectionist models; modularity; past tense; reading.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology.Jerry A. Fodor - 1983 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology.Jerry A. Fodor - 1983 - MIT Press.
The Episodic Buffer: A New Component of Working Memory?Alan Baddeley - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (11):417-423.
Citations of this work
Is the Mind Really Modular?Jesse J. Prinz - 2006 - In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 22--36.
Comorbidity: A Network Perspective.Angélique Oj Cramer, Lourens J. Waldorp, Han Lj van der Maas & Denny Borsboom - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):137-150.
What Exactly is Universal Grammar, and has Anyone Seen It?Ewa Dąbrowska - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Extending, Changing, and Explaining the Brain.Mazviita Chirimuuta - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (4):613-638.
Dynamic Self‐Organization and Early Lexical Development in Children.Ping Li, Xiaowei Zhao & Brian Mac Whinney - 2007 - Cognitive Science 31 (4):581-612.
Similar books and articles
Did Residual Normality Ever Have a Chance?Susan C. Levine, Terry Regier & Tracy L. Solomon - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):759-760.
Raising the Bar for Connectionist Modeling of Cognitive Developmental Disorders.Morten H. Christiansen, Christopher M. Conway & Michelle R. Ellefson - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):752-753.
Weak Evidence for a Strong Case Against Modularity in Developmental Disorders.Ralph-Axel Müller - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):764-765.
The Best is yet to Come: The Promise of Models of Developmental Disorders.Yuko Munakata, Jamie O. Edgin & Jennifer Merva Stedron - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):765-766.
The Beauty of Models for Developmental Disorders.J. Briscoe - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):750-752.
Are Developmental Disabilities the Same in Children and Adults?Paula Tallal - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):768-769.
The Residual Normality Assumption and Models of Cognition in Schizophrenia.Ruth Condray & Stuart R. Steinhauer - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):753-754.
Evidence for a Domain-Specific Deficit in Developmental Dyslexia.Franck Ramus - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):767-768.
Neuroconstructivism - I: How the Brain Constructs Cognition.Denis Mareschal, Mark H. Johnson, Sylvain Sirois, Michael Spratling, Michael S. C. Thomas & Gert Westermann - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
How Connectionist Simulations Fail to Account for Developmental Disorders in Children.Christine Temple & Harald Clahsen - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):769-770.