A defence of the semantic conception of evolutionary theory

Biology and Philosophy 2 (1):26-32 (1987)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00127562
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What Was the Syntax‐Semantics Debate in the Philosophy of Science About?Sebastian Lutz - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (2):319-352.
The Semantic Approach to Evolutionary Theory.Marc Ereshefsky - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):59-80.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Modeling Evolution in Theory and Practice.Anya Plutynski - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S225-.
The Semantic Approach and Its Application to Evolutionary Theory.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:278 - 285.
What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?John Beatty - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:397 - 426.
Explanation in the Semantic Conception of Theory Structure.Paul Thompson - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:286 - 296.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
14 ( #344,503 of 2,197,331 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #97,207 of 2,197,331 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature