Blame and the Humean Theory of Motivation

Philosophia 45 (3):1345-1364 (2017)

Authors
Adam Thompson
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Abstract
A classic, though basically neglected question about motivation arises when we attempt to account for blame’s nature—namely, does the recognition central to blame need help from an independent desire in order to motivate the blame-characteristic dispositions that arise in the blamer? Those who have attended to the question think the answer is yes. Hence, they adopt what I call a Humean Construal of blame on which blame is (a) a judgment that an individual S is blameworthy and (b) an independent desire about S not doing as they did or being as they are. This paper rejects arguments for the Humean Construal, illustrates deep failings of that view, and uses these considerations to support anti-Humean accounts of blame in particular and moral motivation more broadly.
Keywords blame  Humean Theory of Motivation  Antihuman Theory of Motivation  Reactive Attitudes  P.F. Strawson
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-017-9818-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Practical Reality.Jonathan Dancy - 2000 - Philosophy 78 (305):414-425.
The Possibility of Altruism.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 22 (86):82-83.
The Humean Theory of Motivation.Michael Smith - 1987 - Mind 96 (381):36-61.
Intention.P. L. Heath & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Philosophical Quarterly 10 (40):281.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Humean Motivation and Humean Rationality.Mark van Roojen - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 79 (1):37-57.
The Humean Theory of Reasons.Mark Schroeder - 2007 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 2. Oxford University Press. pp. 195--219.
Because I Believe It’s the Right Thing to Do.Joshua May - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):791-808.
Theories of Content and Theories of Motivation.Ralph Wedgwood - 1995 - European Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):273-288.
Ethical Relativism and Ethical Reasons.Mark Steven van Roojen - 1993 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Directions of Fit and the Humean Theory of Motivation.Mary Clayton Coleman - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):127 – 139.
Motivation-Encompassing Attitudes.Christopher G. Framarin - 2008 - Philosophical Explorations 11 (2):121 – 130.
Character and Blame in Hume and Beyond.Antti Kauppinen - 2016 - In Iskra Fileva (ed.), Questions of Character. Oxford University Press.
Motivation in Agents.Christian Miller - 2008 - Noûs 42 (2):222–266.
Why There Is Really No Such Thing as the Theory of Motivation.Jonathan Dancy - 1995 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:1-18.
The Conflation of Moral and Epistemic Virtue.Julia Driver - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (3):367-383.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-19

Total views
121 ( #58,700 of 2,235,441 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #16,186 of 2,235,441 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature