Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):661-676 (2012)

Authors
Alan Thomas
University of York
Abstract
Taurek cases focus a choice between two views of permissible action, Can Save One and Must Save Many . It is argued that Taurek cases do illustrate the rationale for Can Save One , but existing views do not highlight the fact that this is because they are examples of claims grounded on non-comparative justice. To act to save the many solely because they form a group is to discriminate against the one for an irrelevant reason. That is a canonical form of non-comparative injustice. The error lies in taking a contingency of some presentations of some Taurek cases, namely, that they involve distribution, to introduce the claims of comparative as opposed to non-comparative justice. But cases of non-comparative justice can, contingently, also involve distribution. In order to settle which form of justice applies it is necessary to examine the nature of the distribution involved and the nature of “classes” to which individuals can be assigned
Keywords Taurek  Numbers scepticism  Particularism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-012-9358-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Ethics Without Principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Rescuing Justice and Equality.G. A. Cohen (ed.) - 2008 - Harvard University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
What is the Point of Equality?Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Taurek, Numbers and Probabilities.Rob Lawlor - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):149 - 166.
Equality and Comparative Justice.David Alm - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (4):309-325.
What Is Wrong With Kamm's and Scanlon's Arguments Against Taurek.Tyler Doggett - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (3):1-16.
Two Senses of Justice: Confucianism, Rawls, and Comparative Political Philosophy.Erin M. Cline - 2007 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (4):361-381.
Response to Anderson.John Zeis - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):619-624.
Saving the Few.Tyler Doggett - 2013 - Noûs 47 (2):302-315.
Comparative and Non-Comparative Justice.Phillip Montague - 1980 - Philosophical Quarterly 30 (119):131-140.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-29

Total views
210 ( #39,148 of 2,333,192 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #98,991 of 2,333,192 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes