Kant's Theory of Punishment

Utilitas 15 (2):206 (2003)
Abstract
The most widespread interpretation amongst contemporary theorists of Kant's theory of punishment is that it is retributivist. On the contrary, I will argue there are very different senses in which Kant discusses punishment. He endorses retribution for moral law transgressions and consequentialist considerations for positive law violations. When these standpoints are taken into consideration, Kant's theory of punishment is more coherent and unified than previously thought. This reading uncovers a new problem in Kant's theory of punishment. By assuming a potential offender's intentional disposition as Kant does without knowing it for certain, we further exacerbate the opportunity for misdiagnosis
Keywords Kant  punishment  retribution  retributivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820800003952
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,803
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total downloads
196 ( #22,820 of 2,202,776 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #25,853 of 2,202,776 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature