Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (2):191-197 (2019)

Authors
Christine Thomas
Oklahoma State University
Abstract
ABSTRACT Early in Plato’s Euthydemus, sophistical arguments threaten the intelligibility of the process of learning. According to M. M. McCabe, Socrates resists the sophists’ arguments by resisting their problematic replacement model of change. The replacement model proposes that one item is simply replaced with a nonidentical item. Socrates is said to endorse a rival metaphysics of temporally extended, teleologically structured activities. The rival model allows an enduring subject to survive ‘aspect changes’ by occupying distinct stages in a continuous, unified process. McCabe may be right that Socrates presupposes or favors a metaphysics of continuous, end-oriented activities. If so, there are independent reasons to strive to understand the teleological structure of the activity of learning. Nevertheless, I am not convinced that Socrates relies on such a metaphysics to resist the learning arguments at 275d—278d. I argue that Socrates appeals, instead, to the complexity of the learning process to recognize two distinct, yet related, uses of the term ‘learning.’ In order to resist the sophists’ arguments, Socrates recommends attending to ‘the correctness of names’. Socrates’s disambiguating response is sufficient to dissolve the sophistical arguments while remaining compatible with a variety of metaphysics of individuals and activities.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2021
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/24740500.2020.1716665
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,848
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Putting the Right Question First.Ron Royer - 1987 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 7 (2).
Social Dexterity in Inquity and Argumentation: An Apologia of Socrates.Robert Colter & Joseph Ulatowski - 2016 - American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 2:6-27.
The Emerging Good in Plato's 'Philebus'.John Garner - 2017 - Evanston, IL, USA: Northwestern University Press.
Recollection and Self-Understanding in the Phaedo1.I. N. Robins - 1997 - Classical Quarterly 47 (02):438-.
Atomistic Learning in Non-Modular Systems.Pierre Poirier - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (3):313-325.
Recollection and Self-Understanding in the Phaedo.I. Robins - 1997 - Classical Quarterly 47 (2):438-451.
Law and Obedience: The Arguments of Plato’s Crito. [REVIEW]G. W. T. - 1980 - Review of Metaphysics 34 (2):403-404.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-01-24

Total views
2 ( #1,386,742 of 2,433,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #294,010 of 2,433,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes