Metaphysical Disputes and Metalinguistic Negotiation

Analytic Philosophy 58 (1):1-28 (2017)
Authors
Amie Thomasson
Dartmouth College
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phib.12087
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Logical Pluralism From a Pragmatic Perspective.Teresa Kouri Kissel - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):578-591.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy.David Plunkett - 2015 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (7-8):828-874.
Composition, Colocation, and Metaontology.Karen Bennett - 2009 - In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 38.
Metalinguistic Negation and Metaphysical Affirmation.Mahrad Almotahari - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):497-517.
Simplement, as a Metalinguistic Operator.T. Nyan - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (3):275-295.
Metaphysical Realism and Idealisation.Damian Cox - 1998 - Philosophia 26 (3-4):465-487.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-05-17

Total downloads
38 ( #158,610 of 2,259,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #29,311 of 2,259,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature