Need and safety: The nuclear power debate

Environmental Ethics 6 (1):57-69 (1984)
Abstract
Many arguments for and against nuclear power can be analyzed according to a matrix of logically competing claims on the need and safety of nuclear power. Logical analysis of the arguments reveals their philosophical basis and contributes to an understanding of their explanatory appeal. The evidential value of claims made in the arguments of both supporters and opponents depends upon familiar issues in the philosophy of language and the philosophy of science
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics19846121
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,692
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ethics and Energy Supplement.Mark A. Stevenson & Victor S. Godden - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (8):609 - 615.
Ethics and Energy Supplement.Mark Stevenson & Victor S. Godden - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):609 - 615.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

14 ( #329,777 of 2,158,481 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #354,694 of 2,158,481 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums