On the axiomatics of resource allocation: Interpreting the consistency principle

Economics and Philosophy 28 (3):385-421 (2012)
Abstract
An allocation rule is ‘consistent’ if the recommendation it makes for each problem ‘agrees’ with the recommendation it makes for each associated reduced problem, obtained by imagining some agents leaving with their assignments. Some authors have described the consistency principle as a ‘fairness principle’. Others have written that it is not about fairness, that it should be seen as an ‘operational principle’. We dispute the particular fairness interpretations that have been offered for consistency, but develop a different and important fairness foundation for the principle, arguing that it can be seen as the result of adding ‘some’ efficiency to a ‘post-application’ and efficiency-free expression of solidarity in response to population changes. We also challenge the interpretations of consistency as an operational principle that have been given, and here identify a sense in which such an interpretation can be supported. We review and assess the other interpretations of the principle, as ‘robustness’, ‘coherence’ and ‘reinforcement’.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0266267112000296
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,248
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
How to Be Fairer.Conrad Heilmann & Stefan Wintein - 2017 - Synthese 194 (9):3475-3499.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Can the Maximum Entropy Principle Be Explained as a Consistency Requirement?J. Uffink - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (3):223-261.
Is the Precautionary Principle Unscientific?B. D. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (2):329-344.
Popper and the Rationality Principle.Maurice Lagueux - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (4):468-480.
The Consistency Strength of $\Mathrm{MP_{CCC}}(\Mathbb{R})$.George Leibman - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (2):181-193.
The Stakeholders as Investors.Stephan Cludts - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (4):673-676.
The Liberty Principle and Universal Health Care.Benjamin Sachs - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):pp. 149-172.
Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness.Robert A. Phillips - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (1):51-66.
Added to PP index
2012-11-29

Total downloads
25 ( #208,391 of 2,192,214 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #33,506 of 2,192,214 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature