Putnam’s Proof Revisited

In Sanjit Chakraborty & James Ferguson Conant (eds.), Engaging Putnam. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 63-88 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

IV*—On Putnam's Proof that We are not Brains-in-a-Vat1.Crispin Wright - 1992 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92 (1):67-94.
Putnam's review of gödel's proof.Ernest Nagel & James R. Newman - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (2):209-211.
Putnam’s indispensability argument revisited, reassessed, revived.Otávio Bueno - 2018 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 33 (2):201-218.
Putnam on Ontology.Matti Eklund - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 95 (1):203-222.
Compatibilism and the burden of proof.Peter van Inwagen - 1980 - Analysis 40 (March):98-100.
Hairier than Putnam Thought.Stephen Read & Crispin Wright - 1985 - Analysis 45 (1):56–58.
The ontological proof revisited.Nicholas Rescher - 1959 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):138 – 148.
Intuitionists are not (turing) machines.Crispin Wright - 1995 - Philosophia Mathematica 3 (1):86-102.
A Proposal for a Non-Realist Theory of Truth.María Ponte Azcárate - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:105-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-07

Downloads
19 (#717,158)

6 months
5 (#366,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references