Reflections (2 of 4): Discourse ethics for agricultural biotechnology: Its limits and its inevitability — A response to Jamieson [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):275-278 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-000-0055-6

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reflections (2 of 4).Paul B. Thompson - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):275-278.
Agricultural biotechnology and the future benefits argument.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.
Reflections (1 of 4).Dale Jamieson - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):265-273.
A Response to Martin Calkins's “How Casuistry and Virtue Ethics Might Break the Ideological Stalemate Troubling Agricultural Biotechnology”.Ronald Sandler - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (2):319-327.
Crop Biotechnology for the Environment?Sven Ove Hansson & Karin Joelsson - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (4):759-770.
An aretaic objection to agricultural biotechnology.Ronald Sandler - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):301-317.
The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate.Dane Scott - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
The magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology.Dane Scott - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):189-197.
The first European congress on agricultural and food ethics and follow-up workshop on ethics and food biotechnology: A US perspective. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Burkhardt, Paul B. Thompson & Tarla Rae Peterson - 2000 - Agriculture and Human Values 17 (4):327-332.
Biotechnology: an agricultural revolution.Public Acceptability of Agricultural Biotechnology - 1995 - In T. B. Mepham, G. A. Tucker & J. Wiseman (eds.), Issues in Agricultural Bioethics. Nottingham University Press.
The ethics of agri-food biotechnology : how can an agricultural technology be so important?Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Paul Thompson, food biotechnology in ethical perspective, London: Blackie academic and professional, 1997. [REVIEW]Fred Gifford - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):341-347.
Ideology and agricultural technology in the late twentieth century: Biotechnology as symbol and substance. [REVIEW]Frederick H. Buttel - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (2):5-15.
Review of Gary L. Comstock, Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology. [REVIEW]Paul B. Thompson - 2001 - Agriculture and Human Values 18 (3):341-345.
Agricultural Biotechnology and Environmental Justice.Kristen Hessler - 2011 - Environmental Ethics 33 (3):267-282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
6 (#1,430,516)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul B. Thompson
Michigan State University

Citations of this work

Values, technologies, and epistemology.Zahra Meghani - 2008 - Agriculture and Human Values 25 (1):25-34.
Genetically Modified Organisms: An Indian Ethical Dilemma. [REVIEW]Amanpreet Kaur, R. K. Kohli & P. S. Jaswal - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (3):621-628.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The ethics of truth-telling and the problem of risk.Paul B. Thompson - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):489-510.

Add more references