Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):87-103 (2012)
Though the term “commodification” is used broadly, a theory of the processes by which goods become exchangeable and in fact objects of monetized exchange reveals a key site for technological politics. Commodities are goods that are alienable, somewhat rival, generally with low exclusion costs, and that are often consumed in use. Technological advances can affect all of these traits for certain goods, effectively bringing about a process of commodification by technological means. However, in order to function with specific contexts, technologies are designed and manufactured according to technical standards, standards that in turn take on features of what David Grewal ( 2008 ) has called “network power.” As such, standard setting processes become the potential locus for political argument over the legitimacy of a commodification process. Theorists hoping to develop more democratic theories of technological governance should thus recognize the significance of standards and the role they play in either promoting or controlling social relations organized according to the norms of monetized exchange.
|Keywords||Technical standards Innovation Political economy Critical theory Networks Animals Environmental Ethics Philosophy of technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design.Peter-Paul Verbeek - 2005 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth.Don Ihde - 1990 - Indiana University Press.
The Agrarian Vision: Sustainability and Environmental Ethics.Paul B. Thompson - 2010 - University Press of Kentucky.
Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited.Andrew Feenberg - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On the Peculiarity of Standards: A Reply to Thompson.Lawrence Busch & Kyle Whyte - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (2):243-248.
On Commodification and the Governance of Academic Research.Merle Jacob - 2009 - Minerva 47 (4):391-405.
Theorizing Technological and Institutional Change.Paul Thompson - 2007 - Techne 11 (1):19-31.
Commodification, Information, Value and Profit.Peter Fleissner - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):39-53.
Technological Presence: Actuality and Potentiality in Subject Constitution. [REVIEW]Asle H. Kiran - 2012 - Human Studies 35 (1):77-93.
The (Alleged) Inherent Normativity of Technological Explanations.Jeroen de Ridder - 2006 - Techne 10 (1):79-94.
Problematising the Technological: The Object as Event?Adrian Mackenzie - 2005 - Social Epistemology 19 (4):381 – 399.
Compassion Versus Competitiveness: An Industrial Relations Perspective on the Impact of Globalization on the Standards of Employee Relations Ethics in the United States.Charles Cambridge - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (1):87 – 103.
Representación Y Resistencia Al Cambio Científico.León Olive - 1986 - Theoria 1 (3):621-640.
When One Size Does Not Fit All: A Problem of Fit Rather Than Failure for Voluntary Management Standards. [REVIEW]Dayna Simpson, Damien Power & Robert Klassen - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 110 (1):85-95.
Technological Metaphors and Moral Education: The Hacker Ethic and the Computational Experience.Bryan R. Warnick - 2004 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (4):265-281.
The Technological Construction of Social Power.Philip Brey - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (1):71 – 95.
Added to index2011-05-11
Total downloads30 ( #170,151 of 2,164,599 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,948 of 2,164,599 )
How can I increase my downloads?