The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):89 - 117 (2011)

Authors
Frej Thomsen
Roskilde University (PhD)
Abstract
This article analyses the moral status of racial profiling from a consequentialist perspective and argues that, contrary to what proponents of racial profiling might assume, there is a prima facie case against racial profiling on consequentialist grounds. To do so it establishes general definitions of police practices and profiling, sketches out the costs and benefits involved in racial profiling in particular and presents three challenges. The foundation challenge suggests that the shifting of burdens onto marginalized minorities may, even when profiling itself is justified, serve to prolong unjustified police practices. The valuation challenge argues that although both costs and benefits are difficult to establish, the benefits of racial profiling are afflicted with greater uncertainty than the costs, and must be comparatively discounted. Finally, the application challenge argues that using racial profiling in practice will be complicated by both cognitive and psychological biases, which together reduce the effectiveness of profiling while still incurring its costs. Jointly, it is concluded, these challenges establish a prima facie case against racial profiling, so that the real challenge consists in helping officers practice the art of the police and not see that which it is useless that they should see.
Keywords Consequentialism  Crime  Ethics  Police  Profiling  Race
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10892-010-9099-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics and Intuitions.Peter Singer - 2005 - The Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):331-352.
Racial Profiling.Mathias Risse & Richard Zeckhauser - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (2):131-170.
Nothing Personal: On Statistical Discrimination.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (4):385–403.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Learning to Discriminate: The Perfect Proxy Problem in Artificially Intelligent Criminal Sentencing.Benjamin Davies & Thomas Douglas - forthcoming - In Jesper Ryberg & Julian V. Roberts (eds.), Sentencing and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Racial Profiling and Criminal Justice.Jesper Ryberg - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):79 - 88.
Racial Profiling and Background Injustice.Paul Bou-Habib - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):33 - 46.
Profiling Color.J. Angelo Corlett - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):21 - 32.
Ethical Profiling.Michael Boylan - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):131 - 145.
Review Essay / The “P” Word: Profiling.Fedwa Malti‐Douglas - 2002 - Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (2):66-73.
Racial Profiling and Jury Trials.Annabelle Lever - 2009 - The Jury Expert 21 (1):20-35.
Nietzsche's Racial Profiling.James Winchester - 2005 - In Andrew Valls (ed.), Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy. Cornell University Press.
Racial Profiling: A Reply to Two Critics.Mathias Risse - 2007 - Criminal Justice Ethics 26 (1):4-19.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-30

Total views
641 ( #11,152 of 2,463,140 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
104 ( #6,292 of 2,463,140 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes