In José Bermudez (ed.), Self-control, decision theory and rationality. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press (2018)

Authors
Johanna Thoma
London School of Economics
Abstract
In the dynamic choice literature, temptations are usually understood as temporary shifts in an agent’s preferences. What has been puzzling about these cases is that, on the one hand, an agent seems to do better by her own lights if she does not give into the temptation, and does so without engaging in costly commitment strategies. This seems to indicate that it is instrumentally irrational for her to give into temptation. On the other hand, resisting temptation also requires her to act contrary to the preferences she has at the time of temptation. But that seems to be instrumentally irrational as well. I here consider the two most prominent types of argument why resisting temptation could nevertheless be instrumentally rational, namely two-tier and intra-personal cooperation arguments. I establish that the arguments either fail or are redundant. In particular, the arguments fail under the pervasive assumption in both decision theory and the wider literature on practical rationality that the agent’s preferences over the objects of choice are themselves the standard of instrumental rationality. And they either still fail or they become redundant when we give up that assumption.
Keywords temptation  self-control  dynamic choice  instrumental rationality
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Assure and Threaten.David Gauthier - 1994 - Ethics 104 (4):690-721.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Temptation, Resolutions, and Regret.Chrisoula Andreou - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (3):275-292.
Temptation and the Agent’s Standpoint.Michael E. Bratman - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (3):293-310.
The Temptation of God Incarnate.David Werther - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (1):47-50.
Temptation and Deliberation.Chrisoula Andreou - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (3):583-606.
A Model of Consumption-Dependent Temptation.Wojciech Olszewski - 2011 - Theory and Decision 70 (1):83-93.
Where Do Preferences Come From?Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2013 - International Journal of Game Theory 42 (3):613-637.
The Varieties of Instrumental Rationality.Stephen Ellis - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):199-220.
Instrumental Desires, Instrumental Rationality.Edward Harcourt - 2004 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):111–129.
Instrumentally Rational Myopic Planning.Chrisoula Andreou - 2004 - Philosophical Papers 33 (2):133-145.
The Varieties of Instrumental Rationality.Stephen Ellis - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):199-220.
In Defense of Adaptive Preferences.Donald W. Bruckner - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (3):307 - 324.
Willing, Wanting, Waiting.Richard Holton - 2009 - Oxford University Press UK.
TEMPTATION, Reflections on Matthew 6.13.William Charlton - 2018 - New Blackfriars 99 (1081):277-286.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-04-29

Total views
140 ( #68,237 of 2,403,892 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #26,551 of 2,403,892 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes