The opposite of human enhancement: Nanotechnology and the blind chicken problem [Book Review]

NanoEthics 2 (3):305-316 (2008)

Authors
Paul B. Thompson
Michigan State University
Abstract
Nanotechnologies that have been linked to the possibility of enhancing cognitive capabilities of human beings might also be deployed to reduce or eliminate such capabilities in non-human vertebrate animals. A surprisingly large literature on the ethics of such disenhancement has been developed in response to the suggestion that it would be an ethically defensible response to animal suffering both in medical experimentation and in industrial livestock production. However, review of this literature illustrates the difficulty of formulating a coherent ethical debate. Well structured arguments for disenhancement can be made on the basis of mainstream views on the basis of ethical obligations to animals, but these arguments have not been persuasive against the moral intuition that disenhancements are unethical. At the same time, attempts to ground these intuitions in a coherent philosophical doctrine have been plagued by logical fallacies and question begging assertions. As such, the debate over animal disenhancement forecasts an enduring conundrum with respect to the core question of transforming the nature of sentient beings, and this conundrum is logically independent of claims that relate either to the distinctive of human beings or to issues deriving from the emphasis on enhancement
Keywords Ethics  Biotechnology  Livestock  Animal welfare  Animal rights  Intuition  Behavior  Perfectionism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11569-008-0052-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,625
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
Science and Ethics.Bernard E. Rollin - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Genetically Modifying Livestock for Improved Welfare: A Path Forward.Adam Shriver & Emilie McConnachie - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (2):161-180.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
260 ( #21,806 of 2,242,329 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #160,510 of 2,242,329 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature