Values based practice and authoritarianism

In (2014)

Authors
Tim Thornton
University of Central Lancashire
Abstract
Values based practice is a radical view of the place of values in medicine which develops from a philosophical analysis of values, illness and the role of ethical principles. It denies two attractive and traditional but misguided views of medicine: that diagnosis is a merely factual matter and that the values that should guide treatment and management can be codified in principles. But, in the work of KWM Fulford, it goes further in the form of a radical liberal view: that the idea of an antecedently good outcome should be replaced by that of a right process. That however leads to a dilemma as to whether it can account for its own normative status. Given that difficulty, why might one adopt the radical version? I sketch a possible motive drawing on Rorty’s rejection of authoritarianism which replaces objectivity with solidarity as the aim of judgement. But I argue that, nevertheless, this does not justify the rejection of the more modest particularist version of VBP.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mental Illness and Reductionism: Can Functions Be Naturalized?Tim Thornton - 2000 - Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 9 (1):229-253.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Radical Liberal Values‐Based Practice.Tim Thornton - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):988-991.
Values‐Based Medicine and Modest Foundationalism.Miles Little, Wendy Lipworth, Jill Gordon, Pippa Markham & Ian Kerridge - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (5):1020-1026.
Which Values? And Whose? A Reply to Fulford.Bob Brecher - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):996-998.
Values-Based Practice and Reflective Judgment.Tim Thornton - 2008 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 15 (2):125-133.
Values‐Based Practice: Fulford's Dangerous Idea.Kenneth W. M. Fulford - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):537-546.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-01-26

Total views
31 ( #296,173 of 2,285,998 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #833,345 of 2,285,998 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature