Worldwide deliberation and public use of reason online

Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):243-252 (2006)
Abstract
The aim of this paper is threefold: (i) to trace the idea of deliberation back in the history of philosophy and establish the link to the Kantian concept of public reason; (ii) to pave the way for rhetoric as a constituent part of public deliberation; (iii) to undertake an applied ethical approach to worldwide deliberation online. The two former aims are treated in part one of the paper, whereas the applied analysis is undertaken in part two. One important task is to demonstrate in what ways the internet as a new and powerful venue for deliberation both challenges the old theories of public deliberation, and also points in the direction of certain revisions of our basic ideas about deliberation.
Keywords enlarged thinking   public reason   rhetoric   worldwide deliberation online
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-006-9116-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,848
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Inclusion and Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Democracy and Disagreement.Amy Gutmann - 1996 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
28 ( #200,167 of 2,210,506 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #166,029 of 2,210,506 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature