Journal of Early Modern Studies 4 (1):79-103 (2015)

Authors
Tzuchien Tho
Bristol University
Abstract
A central controversy in the reception of Leibniz’s philosophy, not only during his lifetime, but also in the immediately posthumous period and more recently, concerns the role that substantial forms play in Leibniz’s ontology. Interpreters like Garber argue that the Leibnizian defense of the quasi-Scholastic substantial forms in the 1680’s-1690’s demonstrate an ontology of corporeal substance irreducible to an idealist ontology. On the other hand interpreters like Adams argue that corporeal substances reduce to a fully idealist ontology and that this period in Leibniz’s work only demonstrate a modification of idealism. In this paper I argue that without clarifying the ambiguous status of what constitutes “ontology” for Leibniz, the stakes of this longstanding debate are unclear and the anti-idealist position appears to be a self-defeating one. By turning to a thorough reading of Leibniz’s transition from the middle to the late years and noting key turns in its historical reception, I argue that the anti-phenomenalist position becomes meaningful in light of an idealist ontology rather than in spite of it. My aim is not to defend either idealism or anti-idealism but rather to reconfi gure the nature of the controversy concerning substantial forms by outlining the limits of current debates over Leibniz’s ontology.
Keywords History  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 2285-6382
DOI 10.5840/jems2015414
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Kind of Idealist Was Leibniz?Michael K. Shim - 2005 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):91 – 110.
Leibniz and the Fardella Memo.Shane Duarte - 2009 - Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):67-87.
Leibniz on Form and Matter.Daniel Garber - 1997 - Early Science and Medicine 2 (3):326-351.
Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. [REVIEW]Stephen Puryear - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-10-06

Total views
37 ( #304,614 of 2,498,162 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #212,239 of 2,498,162 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes