Authors
Iain Thomson
University of New Mexico
Abstract
In Questioning Technology, Feenberg accuses Heidegger of an untenable 'technological essentialism'. Feenberg's criticisms are addressed not to technological essentialism as such, but rather to three particular kinds of technological essentialism: ahistoricism, substantivism, and one-dimensionalism. After these three forms of technological essentialism are explicated and Feenberg's reasons for finding them objectionable explained, the question whether Heidegger in fact subscribes to any of them is investigated. The conclusions are, first, that Heidegger's technological essentialism is not at all ahistoricist, but the opposite, an historical conception of the essence of technology which serves as the model for Feenberg's own view. Second, that while Heidegger does indeed advocate a substantivist technological essentialism, he offers a plausible, indirect response to Feenberg's voluntaristic, Marcusean objection. Third, that Heidegger's one-dimensional technological essentialism is of a non-objectionable variety, since it does not force Heidegger to reject technological devices in toto. These conclusions help vindicate Heidegger's ground-breaking ontological approach to the philosophy of technology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/002017400750051233
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Turning.Martin Heidegger & Kenneth R. Maly - 1971 - Research in Phenomenology 1 (1):3-16.
Traditional Language and Technological Language.Martin Heidegger & Wanda Torres Gregory - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:129-145.
Traditional Language and Technological Language.Martin Heidegger & Wanda Torres Gregory - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:129-145.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Thinking Technology, Thinking Nature.Dana S. Belu - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (6):572 – 591.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Should Technological Imperatives Be Obeyed?Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):181 – 189.
The Ontic and the Ontological in Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology: Response to Thomson.Andrew Feenberg - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):445 – 450.
Socially Constructed Technology.David J. Stump - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):217 – 224.
Traditional Language and Technological Language.Martin Heidegger & Wanda Torres Gregory - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:129-145.
Constructivism and Technology Critique: Replies to Critics.Andrew Feenberg - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):225 – 237.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
66 ( #175,614 of 2,520,842 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #166,892 of 2,520,842 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes