What's wrong with being a technological essentialist? A response to Feenberg

Abstract
In Questioning Technology, Feenberg accuses Heidegger of an untenable 'technological essentialism'. Feenberg's criticisms are addressed not to technological essentialism as such, but rather to three particular kinds of technological essentialism: ahistoricism, substantivism, and one-dimensionalism. After these three forms of technological essentialism are explicated and Feenberg's reasons for finding them objectionable explained, the question whether Heidegger in fact subscribes to any of them is investigated. The conclusions are, first, that Heidegger's technological essentialism is not at all ahistoricist, but the opposite, an historical conception of the essence of technology which serves as the model for Feenberg's own view. Second, that while Heidegger does indeed advocate a substantivist technological essentialism, he offers a plausible, indirect response to Feenberg's voluntaristic, Marcusean objection. Third, that Heidegger's one-dimensional technological essentialism is of a non-objectionable variety, since it does not force Heidegger to reject technological devices in toto. These conclusions help vindicate Heidegger's ground-breaking ontological approach to the philosophy of technology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/002017400750051233
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,334
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Thinking Technology, Thinking Nature.Dana S. Belu - 2005 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (6):572 – 591.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Should Technological Imperatives Be Obeyed?Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):181 – 189.
Constructivism and Technology Critique: Replies to Critics.Andrew Feenberg - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):225 – 237.
Traditional Language and Technological Language.Martin Heidegger & Wanda Torres Gregory - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:129-145.
Socially Constructed Technology.David J. Stump - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):217 – 224.
The Ontic and the Ontological in Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology: Response to Thomson.Andrew Feenberg - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):445 – 450.
From the Question Concerning Technology to the Quest for a Democratic Technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg.Iain Thomson - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):203 – 215.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
36 ( #160,278 of 2,225,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #114,243 of 2,225,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature